(via deresbabyh)
I donât understand the argument against it legally. I know what their problem is, but how do they argue it in court? I can imagine when they get to the Supreme Court and the lawyers for the gay side are like, âWell, your honour, we pay taxes, thereâs nothing illegal about what we do, weâre the same as anyone else; why shouldnât we get the same protection under law as heterosexuals get?â
And then they ask the other lawyer and he says, âYour honour, theyâre fucking queer, theyâre fucking queer!â
Thatâs it isnât it? Thatâs the whole argument.